<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The BBC&#8217;s SEO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.hackbash.com/2009/12/08/the-bbcs-seo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.hackbash.com/2009/12/08/the-bbcs-seo/</link>
	<description>wake up and smell the copy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 08:40:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: cpev</title>
		<link>http://blog.hackbash.com/2009/12/08/the-bbcs-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-7823</link>
		<dc:creator>cpev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 23:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hackbash.com/?p=739#comment-7823</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve noticed this a lot recently on the BBC Sport&#039;s online tennis coverage. This evening I&#039;ve clicked on a sidebar link snappily titled &#039;Henman on Murray&#039; and found myself looking at &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/tennis/8480832.stm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;a page entitled &#039;Tim Henman on Andrew Murray&#039;s victory over Rafael Nadal&#039;&lt;/a&gt;. 

I&#039;d have to work really hard to work myself into any kind of lather about this. As handolio says, it&#039;s a relatively inoffensive kind of SEO play. But it&#039;s a bit naff isn&#039;t it? A kind of &#039;beiging&#039; of editorial.

Ok, I may find this content according to the keywords I&#039;ve just Googled; but if they keep this up, the BBC&#039;s brand pull in the search results will start to wane in the face of more charismatic alternatives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve noticed this a lot recently on the BBC Sport&#8217;s online tennis coverage. This evening I&#8217;ve clicked on a sidebar link snappily titled &#8216;Henman on Murray&#8217; and found myself looking at <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/tennis/8480832.stm" rel="nofollow">a page entitled &#8216;Tim Henman on Andrew Murray&#8217;s victory over Rafael Nadal&#8217;</a>. </p>
<p>I&#8217;d have to work really hard to work myself into any kind of lather about this. As handolio says, it&#8217;s a relatively inoffensive kind of SEO play. But it&#8217;s a bit naff isn&#8217;t it? A kind of &#8216;beiging&#8217; of editorial.</p>
<p>Ok, I may find this content according to the keywords I&#8217;ve just Googled; but if they keep this up, the BBC&#8217;s brand pull in the search results will start to wane in the face of more charismatic alternatives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://blog.hackbash.com/2009/12/08/the-bbcs-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-7166</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 13:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hackbash.com/?p=739#comment-7166</guid>
		<description>I would notice and care if the BBC introduced keywords into URLs. Specifically, I would be able to see what a story was about before clicking through to it, which would be useful.

In any case, I think this beats the old &#039;exam girl smash death tragedy&#039; nonsense headlines they used to have. I assumed they were keyword optimising gone mad. If not, what &lt;i&gt;were&lt;/i&gt; they for?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would notice and care if the BBC introduced keywords into URLs. Specifically, I would be able to see what a story was about before clicking through to it, which would be useful.</p>
<p>In any case, I think this beats the old &#8216;exam girl smash death tragedy&#8217; nonsense headlines they used to have. I assumed they were keyword optimising gone mad. If not, what <i>were</i> they for?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

